Accessibility
Draft, not yet reviewed. This page has not been checked by anyone qualified to check it. It is a placeholder on a test site, it is not a legal notice, and it must not be relied on. Nothing on this test site collects any personal data, so there is nothing yet for a notice to govern.
What has been done
- Real headings in order, real lists, real tables with proper header cells, and one
h1per page. - Every form field has a label joined to it; the tools announce their results to screen readers when they change.
- A “skip to content” link, and a visible focus outline on everything you can reach with the keyboard.
- Everything works by keyboard alone, including both tools.
- Text and background colours chosen to meet the contrast ratio in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines at level AA, and nothing relies on colour alone.
- Text reflows to a phone screen and keeps working zoomed to 200 per cent. No horizontal scrolling.
- No motion, no autoplay, no pop-ups, no timed interactions.
What has not been done
This has not been tested with a screen reader, has not been tested by a disabled user, and has not been audited against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines by anyone independent. So this page cannot claim conformance, and does not.
Known gaps on the test site: the printed output of both tools has been designed for legibility in black and white but not tested on a school printer; the PDF downloads have not been checked for tagging or reading order; there is no contact route to report an accessibility problem, because this is a test site.
Draft of 2026. Not reviewed. Not a legal notice.